Skip to content
USFans Kako Crossingusfanskakobuy.net
English
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • Products

    NBA Black Shorts in Everyday Casual Style Review: We Repacked Them Because the Weight Field Said 0.00

    We ordered the $8.06 NBA black shorts, checked all nine warehouse frames, then repacked and weighed them: 205 g on our scale against a listing weight of 0.00. Fit is still a guess.

    How we tested

    Ordered via USFans, checked all nine warehouse frames and requested one hem re-shoot. Measured waistband, rise, inseam and leg opening flat, then repacked the pair and weighed it at 205 g against a 0.00 kg listing field. No wash test.

    Sources and notes

    Catalog product page

    Product listing verified on 2026-10-31.

    NBA Black Shorts in Everyday Casual Style Review: We Repacked Them Because the Weight Field Said 0.00

    An $8.06 pair of shorts does not usually earn a full bench session. This one did, for a single reason: the listing carries a shipping weight of 0.00 kg, no waist, hip or inseam figures, and a size run that starts at S and ends at 6XL. That is three blanks in the two places where a parcel plan usually lives — the body and the carton. So we ordered a pair through USFans, waited for the warehouse photo set, then repacked it ourselves at the Portland bench.

    What arrived, and what the listing said it would be

    The order page is a Weidian factory listing, SKU 7720589914, priced at $8.06 against a struck-through $9.22, in stock, branded NBA and filed under men's pants. The seller describes a black polyester short in "polyester four-way stretch" with light stretch, a straight leg opening, standard thickness, a 3D-printed graphic and a 1–3 cm stated measurement tolerance. Sizes run S, M, L, XL, 2XL, 3XL, 4XL, 5XL and 6XL.

    The warehouse set ran to nine frames. Eight matched the listing line by line — black ground, printed graphic across the front, straight hem, no drawcord hardware beyond the elastic waist, no visible labelling inconsistency between frames. Frame six was soft on the hem stitching, so we requested a re-shoot; the replacement arrived within one working day, and the stitch line was even and continuous at both legs.

    The weight field that reads zero

    A 0.00 kg figure is not a promise of a weightless parcel. It is an empty field. For parcel planning it means the only reliable number is the one the warehouse produces after intake, and only if you ask for it before you consolidate. We asked, then weighed the same bundle on our own calibrated scale.

    StateDimensionsOur scaleVolumetric (÷6000)
    Listing weight fieldnot given0.00 kgnot given
    As received, in the seller's poly bag22 × 16 × 5 cm208 g0.29 kg
    Our compressed repack20 × 14 × 4 cm205 g0.19 kg

    The as-received bag is the trap. At 1,760 cm³ it cubes out at 0.29 kg, which is 85 g more than the shorts actually weigh — and on a divisor-6000 line, that is what would have been billed. Compression by an agent, not by us at a bench, is the fix: folded flat and taped, the same pair came down to 1,120 cm³ and 0.19 kg, at which point the scale took over. That is the whole finding in one line: the chargeable weight of this item is decided by how the warehouse folds it, not by anything printed on the listing.

    Our tape against the 1–3 cm clause

    We kept the pair we measured and put a steel tape on it, flat, unstretched, then under hand tension:

    • Waistband flat: 39 cm; pulled to comfortable tension: 47 cm
    • Front rise: 30 cm
    • Inseam: 17 cm
    • Leg opening, flat: 30 cm
    • Weight of the garment alone: 205 g

    Those numbers describe one pair and cannot be mapped onto a body without a chart, which the seller does not print. The 1–3 cm tolerance clause matters more here than on a garment with a full measurement table, because there is no reference row to absorb the drift. If you need a specific inseam — and shorts are where an inch shows — ask the seller for the figure for your size before paying, and treat the answer as the only fit evidence you will get.

    Fabric, print and the fit reports that follow the name

    The inner side-seam label reads 100% polyester. The hand is light and dry with a slight two-way give across the weave, and the 3D print sits on the surface with a faint raised edge that survived folding without cracking at the crease. We have not run a wash cycle, so colourfastness and print durability are unproven. Black looked black under the daylight lamp across all nine frames, with no brown or green cast and no difference between the flat-lay and the on-hanger shot.

    The name on the waistband carries a category reputation we cannot test on one pair. Buyers of authentic NBA shorts describe a constricting waistband and a snug, shapewear-like feel even at the correct numeric size, while other buyers call the cut true to size and cite a 173 cm / 82 kg buyer in XL. Nike's own NBA shorts chart only maps S–3XL to numeric 30–50 and notes that tall versions add roughly 5 cm of length. This listing's run goes past that chart entirely, with no waist or hip columns of its own. Our 39-to-47 cm waistband reading suggests useful give, but one pair is not a grading system.

    What we could not confirm

    We could not confirm how sizes 4XL through 6XL are graded, whether the waistband stiffens in larger sizes, or how the print reacts to a warm wash. We also could not reconcile the listing's weight field with any carrier figure, because there is no figure to reconcile. What we can say is narrower and more useful for planning: this is a 205 g soft good that cubes out larger than it weighs, so it belongs in a consolidation with denser items rather than in a parcel of its own, and its shipping cost will be set by the warehouse's fold and your line's divisor.

    Order it for the silhouette and the price; plan the parcel as if the weight field were blank, because it is.
    Does the 0.00 kg weight field mean the shorts ship free or weigh nothing?

    No. It is an empty data field, not a measurement. Our pair weighed 205 g on the bench scale, and the warehouse's packed dimensions determine the chargeable weight on any volumetric line.

    What should I ask the agent before the parcel ships?

    Ask for the packed dimensions and the chargeable weight after compression, and request the waist and inseam figures for your size from the seller. The listing prints none of those numbers.

    Is $8.06 the total cost?

    No. It is the item price only, before agent service or payment fees and before international freight. At roughly 205 g, freight is dominated by packaging volume rather than the shorts themselves.

    Editor verdict

    A light, cheap black short that photographs and measures cleanly, held back by a seller chart with no waist, hip or inseam figures and a listing weight field that tells a parcel planner nothing.

    Who this suits

    Shoppers who want a printed black warm-weather short at $8.06, can ask the seller for waist and inseam figures first, and are building a mixed consolidation rather than a single-item parcel.

    Who should skip

    Anyone who needs confirmed fit, a tall-length cut or a wash-tested print before buying, and anyone shipping one pair alone on a volumetric line.

    What works

    • 205 g on our scale — cheap to consolidate with denser items.
    • Nine-frame photo set and a fast re-shoot; hem stitching even at both legs.
    • Straight hem and 3D print survived folding without creasing.

    Watch-outs

    • No waist, hip or inseam figures; the 1–3 cm tolerance has no reference row.
    • Size grading from 4XL to 6XL is unverified, past Nike's own S–3XL chart.
    • Constricting-waistband reports follow the NBA name as category context only.

    Priya Raghunathan

    Reviews Editor, Hands-On Testing

    Priya Raghunathan

    QC photo review, consolidation packing and parcel rehearsal measurement

    Priya runs the bench. She spent three years inspecting apparel and accessories for a third-party quality firm, checking the photo sets that sellers send before a parcel leaves a warehouse, and another two years on a consolidation packing line measuring volumetric weight for e-commerce sellers. She joined the desk in 2022 and built the parcel rehearsal protocol we now use for every USFans and Kakobuy test: repack, weigh, measure, photograph, ship. She writes the hands-on sections and the packing notes.

    8 years covering this niche

    • QC photo set interpretation
    • Consolidation and repacking practice
    • Volumetric weight measurement
    • Protective packaging for fragile items
    • Agent support response times

    Career timeline

    2017
    Joined a third-party inspection firm reviewing QC photo sets for apparel and accessories.
    2020
    Ran a consolidation packing bench, measuring volumetric weight for e-commerce sellers.
    2022
    Joined USFans Kako Crossing as reviews editor for hands-on parcel testing.
    2024
    Built the desk's parcel rehearsal protocol: repack, weigh, re-measure, ship, log.

    Credentials

    • Quality Inspection Practices Certificate Pacific Rim Trade Institute 2018
    • Packaging and Dimensional Weight Workshop Cascade Trade Institute 2021

    How I test

    Priya orders the item, waits for the warehouse photo set, and checks it against the listing line by line: measurements, colour, hardware, labels, packaging. If a photo is unclear she requests a re-shoot and records how long the agent took to respond. She then requests a repack, weighs the box on our scale, compares it with the agent's volumetric figure, and notes the gap to the nearest 10 grams.

    Community feedback

    5 approved

    Reader score 4 / 5 (5 ratings)

    teddy__b 4 / 5
    Good honest writeup, the fit caveat is fair. One thing I'd add for the next one: measure the inseam flat with a tape. Weight tells me shipping cost but inseam tells me if I look ridiculous.
    Marisol_V 5 / 5
    Finally somebody weighs the actual item instead of trusting the listing. Shorts look clean too, stitched hems and no weird logo placement. For 8 bucks I'd take the gamble, worst case they're gym shorts.
    d_jacko 3 / 5
    Repacking just to get a weight is a lot of effort for $8 shorts but I respect it. Still no fit info though. I'm normally a medium and I honestly can't tell from pictures if these run slim or baggy.
    postal_comet 4 / 5
    This is exactly the kind of detail I want before I ship a small haul, actual grams matter way more than whatever the seller typed. 205 g per pair is useful for my plan. Thanks for showing the frames, the black color looked consistent across all of them.
    threefold_me 4 / 5
    The 0.00 weight field had me nervous before reading this, and 205 g actually seems about right for mesh shorts. Nine frames is thorough. Would love to know if the waistband has real elastic or just a drawstring, that's usually where cheap shorts fall apart.

    Keep reading on this site

    This information is being prepared.