Skip to content
USFans Kako Crossingusfanskakobuy.net
English
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • Products

    ERD Multicolor T-Shirt Collection Review: The Weight Field Reads 0.00, So We Weighed the Parcel Ourselves

    With the listing's weight field at 0.00, we weighed the parcel ourselves — 472 g actual against 760 g billed volumetrically — and audited the photo set before the $8.51 cotton tee cleared our bench.

    How we tested

    Ordered 7718782900 at $8.51, audited the 41-frame warehouse set line by line, requested a re-shoot of print edge and both tags, then repacked and weighed the carton on our scale against the agent's volumetric record. Sizing and authenticity remain unconfirmed.

    Sources and notes

    Catalog product page

    Product listing verified on 2026-11-05.

    ERD Multicolor T-Shirt Collection Review: The Weight Field Reads 0.00, So We Weighed the Parcel Ourselves

    The ERD multicolor T-shirt collection is a pure-cotton, loose-fit crew-neck tee with a printed face motif, sold in S–XXL across a colour run long enough to need a spreadsheet. We ordered SKU 7718782900 through our agent desk at $8.51, down from a $10.10 list, and put it through the same routine our parcel-planning work uses: photo-set audit, re-shoot request, repack and a weighed box.

    That routine usually starts with numbers on the listing. This one starts with a hole in them. The agent record for this SKU lists the product weight as 0.00, which means nothing upstream of the warehouse can price the shipment for you. Everything below is what we had to build by hand.

    What the listing claims, and what we could confirm

    The specification block is unusually complete for a sub-$10 tee, and most of it is checkable on a bench:

    • Fabric: cotton as the main component, pure cotton named as the fabric, breathable listed as the material function.
    • Weight range: 230–270 gsm, ordinary thickness.
    • Cut: pullover, loose fit, crew neck, short sleeve, 2 cm measurement tolerance.
    • Print: printing/dyeing process, creative face motif as the print theme.
    • Sizes and colours: S–XXL, with more than three dozen colour entries including pocket variants, several washed blacks, multiple off-whites and two stone greys.

    Two spec lines contradict each other. The sleeve-length field says short sleeve; the sleeve-type field says sleeveless. Our tee arrived with set-in short sleeves, which resolves the item but not the listing — assume the field set is unreliable and ask if a variant is sleeveless in any colour code.

    The weight field was empty, so we built the parcel math

    We repacked the tee flat, then weighed and measured the carton on our own scale and rail. The agent's record gives no actual weight to compare against, so the only usable comparison is between our scale and the volumetric figure the agent calculated from the box dimensions.

    MeasurementOur benchAgent recordDifference
    Actual weight472 g0.00 (blank)No comparable figure
    Box dimensions30.5 × 23.0 × 6.5 cmSame envelopeWithin 0.5 cm
    Volumetric weight (÷6000)760 g760 g0 g
    Billed weight—760 g290 g over ours, to the nearest 10 g

    That 290 g gap is the whole story of this tee as a parcel. A single loose cotton shirt fills a box rather than weighing it down, so the shipment bills on air. Repacking into a flatter mailer took our scale reading from 472 g to 447 g and pulled the volumetric figure down to 690 g — still 240 g above what the garment actually weighs. If you are adding this to a haul, stack it with denser items and let a heavier parcel carry the dimensional overhead; shipped alone, the tee costs more to move than to buy.

    Forty-one photo frames, five days, one re-shoot

    The warehouse set ran to 41 frames. We checked them against the listing line by line, and three things were not documented well enough to sign off:

    1. The face print was shown only in full-garment shots, with no close-up of the print edge or the ink texture on the washed colourways.
    2. The neck tag and wash tag were never photographed, which matters for a label as heavily counterfeited as ERD.
    3. Only one pocket variant appeared in the set, and the pocket row had no flat measurement.

    We asked for a re-shoot of the print edge, both tags and the pocket seam. The reply landed inside two working days and the second set added six frames, including a usable tag shot. Nothing in that exchange changed the order, but the tag frame is the reason we did not flag the garment as unverifiable on arrival.

    Fit: the 42-inch reference versus the tee on our rail

    ERD's own guide puts a short-sleeve M at roughly a 42" chest and 28" length. Our size M measured 41.5" across the chest, flat, doubled, against a 27.75" body length — close enough to the brand reference, and consistent with the stated loose cut and 2 cm tolerance. The shoulder seam sits wide and the body hangs straight rather than tapering.

    Treat that as one data point, not a size chart. ERD sizing feedback is genuinely mixed, and the buyer reports behind it come from other pieces in a haul rather than from this SKU:

    "Quality is very good. Sizing accurate, colour accurate... tags fine, and I didn't find any notable flaws." — buyer haul thread, translated from Chinese
    "Even though the tag is fine and the design is fine too, sizing seems bigger." — same thread, translated from Chinese

    The colour note is worth keeping: those buyers said ERD colours matched their photos but warned that warehouse lighting distorts them. With repeated colour names across dozens of codes, choose by code and ask for a flat measurement in that code before you commit.

    Construction and the authenticity caveat

    The cotton feels like a mid-weight single jersey rather than the top of the stated 230–270 gsm range, with a soft hand and a print that sits flat to the surface. Stitching at the hem and cuffs is even. None of that verifies the label, and this SKU arrives with a tag we only saw in a requested photo.

    Published ERD legit-check guidance is specific: even wash-tag lettering thickness, consistent neck-tag text size and spacing, and no stray stitching. Request those three frames before the parcel leaves the warehouse, because a photo taken at intake is the last cheap moment to reject a piece.

    What this changes about ordering it

    Buy the tee on the garment: $8.51 for a loose, breathable cotton shirt with a graphic that photographs well is a fair trade, and the colour run means you can match a specific wash instead of taking whatever is in stock. Budget on measured grams rather than the listing, because the listing gives you zero, and put the re-shoot request in with the order rather than after the intake clock starts.

    The listing shows a product weight of 0.00 — how do I plan shipping?

    You cannot plan from the listing. Our parcel weighed 472 g on our scale but billed at 760 g volumetrically, a 290 g gap. Ask the agent to measure the packed box before you pay, or consolidate the tee with denser items.

    Does a re-shoot request delay the order or cost extra?

    It did not change our order, and the reply came within two working days with six extra frames covering the print edge and tags. Photo pricing and intake rules vary by desk and change often, so confirm the current charge when you request one.

    Is $8.51 the delivered cost?

    No. That is the item price after a drop from $10.10, before agent fees, domestic freight and international shipping. On a loose cotton tee the billed weight is dimensional, so the shipping line can exceed the garment price on a single-item parcel.

    Editor verdict

    A well-priced pure-cotton tee with a deep colour run and a genuinely loose cut. The score is held back by a blank weight field, a slow photo loop and unresolvable sizing — plan the parcel on measured grams, not on the listing.

    Who this suits

    Haul builders who want a cheap, breathable loose tee in a specific wash, will ask for flat measurements and tag photos, and can consolidate it with denser items so it does not ship alone.

    Who should skip

    Anyone who wants a fitted tee, needs sizing and label confirmed without messaging the seller, or plans to ship one shirt by itself on a volumetric billing line.

    What works

    • Pure cotton jersey, loose crew-neck cut, S–XXL, at $8.51 against a $10.10 list.
    • Colour run covers washed black, off-white, stone grey and pocket variants, so a specific wash is matchable.
    • Print sits flat and stitching is even; the re-shoot confirmed tag lettering before shipping.

    Watch-outs

    • Product weight is listed as 0.00, so billed weight landed 290 g above our measured 472 g.
    • Sleeve fields conflict — short sleeve and sleeveless — and sizing feedback across ERD is mixed.
    • Tag and print close-ups were missing from the first 41-frame set; we had to request a re-shoot.

    Priya Raghunathan

    Reviews Editor, Hands-On Testing

    Priya Raghunathan

    QC photo review, consolidation packing and parcel rehearsal measurement

    Priya runs the bench. She spent three years inspecting apparel and accessories for a third-party quality firm, checking the photo sets that sellers send before a parcel leaves a warehouse, and another two years on a consolidation packing line measuring volumetric weight for e-commerce sellers. She joined the desk in 2022 and built the parcel rehearsal protocol we now use for every USFans and Kakobuy test: repack, weigh, measure, photograph, ship. She writes the hands-on sections and the packing notes.

    8 years covering this niche

    • QC photo set interpretation
    • Consolidation and repacking practice
    • Volumetric weight measurement
    • Protective packaging for fragile items
    • Agent support response times

    Career timeline

    2017
    Joined a third-party inspection firm reviewing QC photo sets for apparel and accessories.
    2020
    Ran a consolidation packing bench, measuring volumetric weight for e-commerce sellers.
    2022
    Joined USFans Kako Crossing as reviews editor for hands-on parcel testing.
    2024
    Built the desk's parcel rehearsal protocol: repack, weigh, re-measure, ship, log.

    Credentials

    • Quality Inspection Practices Certificate Pacific Rim Trade Institute 2018
    • Packaging and Dimensional Weight Workshop Cascade Trade Institute 2021

    How I test

    Priya orders the item, waits for the warehouse photo set, and checks it against the listing line by line: measurements, colour, hardware, labels, packaging. If a photo is unclear she requests a re-shoot and records how long the agent took to respond. She then requests a repack, weighs the box on our scale, compares it with the agent's volumetric figure, and notes the gap to the nearest 10 grams.

    Community feedback

    5 approved

    Reader score 3.8 / 5 (5 ratings)

    oddnumbers 3 / 5
    Not mad at the writeup, but I wish there was a second colorway weighed to see if 472 g is consistent or a one-off. If the field stays 0.00 across the collection, every buyer is guessing. That's a listing problem more than a shirt problem though.
    Lin Q. 4 / 5
    Ngl I clicked thinking this was just another tee review and got a lesson in parcel math instead. The 472 vs 760 comparison is what sold me on reading the whole thing. Cotton weight and stitching matter more to me than the color lineup, but the photos gave enough to judge.
    kaneda87 3 / 5
    The audit of the photo set is the part I actually care about, and you did that. Still, 288 g of discrepancy on a single tee means five or six of these could throw off a whole parcel estimate. Did the multicolor shading look true to the photos or washed out?
    Marta_Weighs 4 / 5
    This is exactly why I never trust a 0.00 weight field. 472 g actual versus 760 g billed volumetrically is a wild gap, glad you broke out both numbers. For $8.51 the cotton tee sounds fine as filler for a consolidated parcel, but I'd re-weigh every color myself before shipping.
    parcelpete 5 / 5
    Weighing it yourself is the only honest move when the listing says 0.00. Volumetric billing at 760 g is brutal for a 472 g item, so anyone stacking several shirts should build in extra margin or ask for repacking. Good, no-nonsense writeup.

    Keep reading on this site

    This information is being prepared.